NICE and MRC to research watchdog’s methodology
pharmafile | June 5, 2009 | News story | |ย ย NICEย
Funding worth £2 million has been made available for research into how NICE can better do its job.
The drug regulator and the Medical Research Council (MRC) called this week for applicants to come up with "policy-relevant research" to improve NICE's methodology.
The move follows a House of Commons Health Select Committee Report last year which highlighted the need for research to back up NICE's decisions.
Chief among the issues to be tackled is re-evaluating the EQ-5D tariff, the metric by which health-related quality of life is assessed.
The two bodies have also identified a need to build new measures into quality-adjusted life years (QALY) calculations to identify benefits or disadvantages which are currently not captured.
NICE has come under fire several times over the past few years for failing to take enough account of patient views.
"This is translational research, it's about getting things into our process and methodology that will make a real difference to patients," insisted NICE clinical and public health director Professor Peter Littlejohns.
Other areas which could be covered by funding include means by which non-experimental evidence – as opposed to that from trials and including information from patients – could best be used in decision-making.
"NICE is tasked with making some of the most difficult decisions in public life, decisions that have an impact on the millions of people who use the NHS," continued Littlejohns.
"It's therefore vital for people to continue to have confidence not just in the guidance we produce, but also in the processes and methods we use to produce it."
Scientists have until 22 July to get their proposals, which will be peer-reviewed externally, to the MRC and a decision on funding is expected in November.
Proposals are likely to look at one of more of the following:
* Analysis and design of effectiveness studies and their synthesis
* Synthesis of evidence from patients, the public and stakeholders
* Economic analysis and uncertainty
* Measurement and valuation of benefits
* Decision making at NICE
Researchers will be expected to start "within a short time frame" and complete work in less than two years.
Professor Sir Ian Kennedy is currently leading a separate review of the way NICE assesses innovation and is expected to present his findings this month.
Related Content

Combination treatments: Takedaโs Implementation Framework and the broader landscape
Pharmafile talks to Emma Roffe, Oncology Country Head (UK & Ireland) about the combination treatment …
NICE recommends Pfizerโs new once-weekly treatment for haemophilia B on NHS
Walton Oaks, 21stย May 2025ย โย Pfizer Ltd announced today that the National Institute for Health and Care …

Dual immunotherapy for bowel cancer now available under NHS
Dual immunotherapy, a combination of Opdivo (nivolumab) and Yervoy (ipilimumab), has been granted extension in …






